I skipped the Asian and the European Silver - and hit the 18th, 19th and early 20th century paintings. There I found new life in paintings I'd already seen - particularly this Julian Alden Weir - The Spreading Oak - it's huge 39 x 50 inches and has thick brushstokes, like rough chiseled wood. It's so natural and beautiful. It inspired me to work larger someday.
I also enjoyed the Childe Hassam, Pissarro and another stunner by Julian Alden Weir. The Hassam reminds me I want to paint a landscape that feels like you're in it - with the ground below and the clouds above, not just in the distance. I get caught up looking so intently ahead, that I sometimes miss creating a space for viewers to dive into. The Pissarro had such lovely tonal control, although my scanner automatically dials up the contrast, so the effect I loved is missing in this scanned postcard. In the original painting, all the values were so compressed, so close, light, like it really looks outside. And finally the Ice Cutters by Weir is just great. so simple.
PAM is set up like and Art History text, in times past I've skipped the Rome - Renaissance - Baroque - Romantic - Pre Impressionist Sections - and I really shouldn't have. Although the Rome - Renaissance - Baroque was boring, I loved their collection of paintings from the 18th and
19th Century. (I wish I'd have taken some photos, I couldn't find most of the ones I liked online) Anyway they have this gorgeous Corot. They also have an awful Bouguereau. I hate that guys work more every day. He sold his soul at the crossroads - for sure.
My main goal was always to get to the Gilkey center - but it wasnt' to be, yet, I wound through the maze and found myself in the modernist side. Starting with the impressionists (where the Pissarro was) and moving up into post- impressionists, modernists, post modern and contemporary pieces. Now the contemporary section had some neat stuff - Fairfield Porter and my new favorite Horatio Torres (the pics shown are not the pieces at PAM - once again unable to find them on the web) - but I don't care to see anything involving a Television - hate that crap, and so much of their contemporary collection looked like mucous to me. A huge encaustic of snot, a huge painting of blood and puss. Disgusting. A huge painting of creepy naked women crawling around with goats head on. I wish I had photos of these to share as well. (with me pretending to vomit next to them). So, I'm an equal opportunity hater - I hate sappy, soulless Bouguereau and I hate goopy soulless apocalyptic sludge.




So I could feel my time running out, my husband and daughter had decided to visit Finnegan's - super fun toy store near by and I knew they wouldn't stay forever, so I skipped the regional section with Pacific Northwest Paintings (sadly) and I skipped the Native American Art, and the Native South American Art and made a beeline for the Gilkey Center - the holy grail of my quest. And I was not disappointed. Beth Van Hoesen truly inspired me. A female printmaker from Northern California whose subjects included portrait, still life of flowers, food, animals, nude figures, landscapes. She has a very pointed matter of fact way of looking at her subjects, sometimes illustrative, but always soulfull. I love how her works often convey a wholeness - not just beautiful, more than that. I'm still mulling over my connection to her work. My husband called to say they were parked outside, so I had to hurry, I couldn't take it in in the way I wanted to. I rushed to the gift shop to buy a book or postcard of Van Hoesen's work and was disappointed to find the magic lost in the books available. In the show it was so rich and wonderful, the books were boring and lifeless. Oh well, such is life. In my internet research I found that for you art collectors out there, her work is very affordable. I saw prices ranging $650 - $5000. Not bad.
So the fact remains that PAM has a lot to offer for me, even after so many trips. I left wanting more. Hopefully I can get back sometime this summer.








0 comments:
Post a Comment